Kansas House committee ponders resolution opposing climate plan

2/13/2014

By HANNAH WISE

By HANNAH WISE

KU Statehouse Wire Service

The Kansas House Committee on Energy and Environment heard testimony Thursday on a non-binding resolution to oppose President Barack Obama's recent plan to curb the effects of climate change.

The president's Climate Action Plan from June 2013 calls for the United States, by 2020, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 17 percent below 2005 levels. It is up to the Environmental Protection Agency to adopt and enforce the plan.

House Resolution 6043 asserts that the president's plan is based on assumptions, incorrect models and a lack of peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It also states that the Earth's climate is not influenced by greenhouse gas emissions from humans, but rather it is following a natural cycle that has been previously observed for thousands of years.

Supporters of the resolution, including Sen. Forrest Knox, R-Altoona, argued that the climate change debate is one rooted in politics rather than science.

"The lack of real debate and the lack of real science, together with the refusal by the alarmists to even recognize the existence of any credible debate, cause me to conclude that there is only one logical explanation for what is occurring," Knox said. "This is all political."

Sedgwick County Commissioner Richard Ranzau and Edward Cross, president of the Kansas Independent Oil & Gas Association, also spoke in support of the resolution.

During his testimony, Cross commended Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt's recent submission of an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals case American Farm Bureau Federation v. Environmental Protection Agency. Schmidt's brief is in support of the plaintiff, the American Farm Bureau.

Cross said the lawsuit shows that states are not in support of increased regulation by the federal government and that Obama's plan would infringe upon state sovereignty.

Rep. Ed Trimmer, D-Winfield, questioned the accuracy of evidence presented by Hedke and called for Chuck Rice, a scientist from Kansas State University, to testify. Rice said peer-reviewed scientific literature says there is uncertainty about climate change, but it is clear there is a heat build-up happening in the deep ocean and the heat has the potential to transition into the atmosphere. Opponents of the resolution argued that the Legislature should be discussing solutions to climate change issues, rather than spending time to pass a non-binding resolution.

Rabbi Moti Rieber, coordinator for Kansas Interfaith Power & Light, and Zach Pistora, a lobbyist for the Kansas Sierra Club, both strongly opposed the resolution. They echoed statements by Hunter that by supporting the resolution, Kansas would be ignoring the climate change issue.

"Putting your fingers in your ears and humming is not an option," Rieber said.

Rep. Russ Jennings, R-Lakin, said that while he believes that the EPA regulations at the state level are "virtually impossible" to enact, he also expressed concerns about the committee making a decision without clear facts.

"I do not wish to make a statement that is not based on fact," Jennings said. "There are clearly parts of this which are based in dispute."

comments powered by Disqus
I commented on a story, but my comments aren't showing up. Why?
We provide a community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. We expect civil dialogue.
Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps you ...
... called someone an idiot, a racist, a moron, etc. Name-calling or profanity (to include veiled profanity) will not be tolerated.
... rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
... included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
... accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
... made a comment in really poor taste.

MULTIMEDIA